From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 23, 1921
229 S.W. 324 (Tex. Crim. App. 1921)

Opinion

No. 6205.

Decided March 23, 1921.

Abating Appeal — Practice on Appeal.

It being shown by proper affidavit on appeal that appellant has escaped, the appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal from the District Court of Hunt. Tried below before the Honorable R.L. Porter.

Appeal from a conviction of robbery by firearms; penalty, six years imprisonment in the penitentiary.

No brief on file for appellant.

E.L. Hartwell, and Evans McCoy, for appellant.

Sam D. Stinson and C.O. James, for the State.


The State's motion to abate this appeal for the reason that the appellant, by his escape, has deprived this court of jurisdiction to pass upon its merits, being accompanied by an affidavit of the Sheriff of Hunt County duly making the facts known, it is ordered that the appeal be dismissed.

Dismissed.


Summaries of

Ross v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 23, 1921
229 S.W. 324 (Tex. Crim. App. 1921)
Case details for

Ross v. the State

Case Details

Full title:JIM ROSS v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Mar 23, 1921

Citations

229 S.W. 324 (Tex. Crim. App. 1921)
89 Tex. Crim. 65

Citing Cases

Flowers v. State

In our judgment, the evidence falls short to support a conviction for the wilful desertion of a wife in…