From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Feb 16, 2017
No. 4D16-3944 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Feb. 16, 2017)

Opinion

No. 4D16-3944

02-16-2017

DANIEL K. ROSS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Daniel K. Ross, Raiford, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Lawrence M. Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 431994CF001100A. Daniel K. Ross, Raiford, pro se. No appearance required for appellee. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. CIKLIN, C.J., WARNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.


Summaries of

Ross v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Feb 16, 2017
No. 4D16-3944 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Feb. 16, 2017)
Case details for

Ross v. State

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL K. ROSS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Feb 16, 2017

Citations

No. 4D16-3944 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Feb. 16, 2017)