From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sep 9, 2014
448 S.W.3d 833 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. WD 76501.

09-09-2014

William ROSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Damien De Loyola, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant. Mary Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.


Damien De Loyola, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.

Mary Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before Division Two: VICTOR C. HOWARD, P.J., JAMES EDWARD WELSH, and ANTHONY REX GABBERT, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

William Ross appeals the circuit court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief in which he sought to have his convictions for forcible rape and first-degree burglary set aside on the basis of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Ross v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sep 9, 2014
448 S.W.3d 833 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Ross v. State

Case Details

Full title:William ROSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Sep 9, 2014

Citations

448 S.W.3d 833 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)