From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct 29, 2013
413 S.W.3d 33 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. WD 75607.

2013-10-29

Bobby Gene ROSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Howard County, Missouri, Cynthia A. Suter, Judge. Mark A. Grothoff, for Appellant. Mary H. Moore, for Respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of Howard County, Missouri, Cynthia A. Suter, Judge.
Mark A. Grothoff, for Appellant. Mary H. Moore, for Respondent.
Before Division One: VICTOR C. HOWARD, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge and ANTHONY REX GABBERT, Judge.

ORDER


PER CURIAM:

Appellant Bobby Gene Ross appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief by the Circuit Court of Howard County. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Ross v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct 29, 2013
413 S.W.3d 33 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Ross v. State

Case Details

Full title:Bobby Gene ROSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Oct 29, 2013

Citations

413 S.W.3d 33 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)