From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. State

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 5, 1932
185 N.E. 882 (Ohio 1932)

Opinion

No. 23491

Decided October 5, 1932.

Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Mahoning county.

Mr. Clyde W. Osborne, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. R.L. Thomas, prosecuting attorney, for defendant in error.


It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

MARSHALL, C.J., JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY and STEPHENSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ross v. State

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 5, 1932
185 N.E. 882 (Ohio 1932)
Case details for

Ross v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROSS v. THE STATE OF OHIO

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Oct 5, 1932

Citations

185 N.E. 882 (Ohio 1932)
125 Ohio St. 645