From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 12, 2006
935 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. 2006)

Opinion

Case No. SC06-1009.

July 12, 2006.

Lower Tribunal No. 4D05-4393.


Because a writ of mandamus cannot be issued to direct the manner in which a court shall act in the lawful exercise of its jurisdiction, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. State ex rel. North St. Lucie River Drainage Dist. v. Kanner, 152 Fla. 400, 403, 11 So. 2d 889, 890 (Fla. 1943); see also Migliore v. City of Lauderhill, 415 So. 2d 62, 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (stating that mandamus "is [not] proper to mandate the doing (or undoing) of a discretionary act"), approved, 431 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 1983). LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, QUINCE, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ross v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 12, 2006
935 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. 2006)
Case details for

Ross v. State

Case Details

Full title:HORACE LAVON ROSS, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jul 12, 2006

Citations

935 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. 2006)