From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. Schweitzer

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Dec 19, 2023
1:21CV1565 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 19, 2023)

Opinion

1:21CV1565

12-19-2023

Steven Ross, Petitioner, v. Warden Tom Schweitzer, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN R. ADAMS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has examined the Report and Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge submitted in this matter on November 28, 2023. Doc 36. Upon due consideration, and no objections having been filed by the parties, the Court adopts the Report and recommended findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and incorporates them herein. Therefore, it is ordered that the petition is hereby DISMISSED.

For the reasons set forth above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is hereby DISMISSED. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that Petitioner may not take an appeal from the Court's decision in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). .

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ross v. Schweitzer

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Dec 19, 2023
1:21CV1565 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 19, 2023)
Case details for

Ross v. Schweitzer

Case Details

Full title:Steven Ross, Petitioner, v. Warden Tom Schweitzer, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Dec 19, 2023

Citations

1:21CV1565 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 19, 2023)

Citing Cases

Barnette v. Bunting

Roe v. Baker, 316 F.3d 557, 570 (6th Cir. 2002); see also Ross v. Ohio Dep't of Corr. Rehabs., No.…

Barnette v. Bunting

Roe v. Baker, 316 F.3d 557, 570 (6th Cir. 2002); see also Ross v. Ohio Dep't of Corr. Rehabs., No.…