From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. Reed

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 29, 2013
Case No. 1:13cv143 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 29, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:13cv143

03-29-2013

Darryl Allen Ross, Plaintiff, v. Officer Dustin R. Reed, et al., Defendants.


Judge Michael R. Barrett


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on March 5, 2013 (Doc. 5).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981. No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 5) have been filed.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 5) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Plaintiff's claim seeking an order requiring that disciplinary and/or criminal charges be brought against defendants is DISMISSED consistent with the Opinion of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

Michael R. Barrett

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ross v. Reed

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 29, 2013
Case No. 1:13cv143 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 29, 2013)
Case details for

Ross v. Reed

Case Details

Full title:Darryl Allen Ross, Plaintiff, v. Officer Dustin R. Reed, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 29, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:13cv143 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 29, 2013)