From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. Moore

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Apr 3, 2001
246 F.3d 1299 (11th Cir. 2001)

Summary

vacating COA on state prisoner's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition

Summary of this case from Williams v. U.S.

Opinion

No. 00-13646.

April 3, 2001.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

Bobby B. Ross, Arcadia, FL, pro se.

Before TJOFLAT and BLACK, Circuit Judges


Appellant has filed a motion for a certificate of appealability (COA), which this Court construes as a motion to expand the COA already granted by the district court. The district court granted a COA as to "[w]hether Petitioner was denied the right to due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution." The issue upon which the district court granted a COA, however, conflicts with the district court's dismissal of the appellant's habeas petition, 28 U.S.C. § 2254, as time-barred under the one-year statute of limitations set forth in the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996. When a district court dismisses a petition as time-barred, it is inappropriate to grant a COA on the constitutional claim e.g., the due process claim in this case. Accordingly, this Court VACATES the order granting a COA and REMANDS the case to the district court for the limited purpose of considering whether a COA should be granted on the question of whether appellant's habeas petition is time-barred. Appellant's motion to expand the COA is DENIED AS MOOT.


Summaries of

Ross v. Moore

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Apr 3, 2001
246 F.3d 1299 (11th Cir. 2001)

vacating COA on state prisoner's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition

Summary of this case from Williams v. U.S.

In Ross, the district court denied the petitioner's § 2254 habeas corpus petition as time-barred under the statute of limitations, but granted a COA on the issue of whether the petitioner was denied the right to due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.

Summary of this case from West v. United States

In Ross we vacated the order granting a COA and remanded to the district court "for the limited purpose of considering whether a COA should be granted on the question of whether appellant's habeas petition is time-barred."

Summary of this case from Ford v. Thomas

involving petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Summary of this case from Molina v. U.S.
Case details for

Ross v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:Bobby B. ROSS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael MOORE, Respondent-Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Apr 3, 2001

Citations

246 F.3d 1299 (11th Cir. 2001)

Citing Cases

West v. United States

We also vacated granting a COA when the issue upon which it granted the COA conflicted with the District…

Williams v. U.S.

When the district court dismisses a habeas petition as time-barred, it is inappropriate for the court to…