See Sproull, 944 F.2d at 911 ("We thus distinguish both [Adams and Wilson] in that the moving parties had presented their legal issues to the court for relief and had not wholly surrendered prosecution of its claims."). Bird v. Wyoming Att'y Gen., 779 F. App'x 546, 548 (10th Cir. 2019) (internal citation and quotation omitted) (upholding a denial of relief from judgment due to a change in law in an unrelated case and explaining "our precedent forecloses relief" in this situation and "it is beyond debate" that the district court did not abuse its discretion); see also Ross v. Bush, 704 F. App'x 771, 773-74 (10th Cir. 2017); Sindar v. Garden, 284 F. App'x 591, 596 (10th Cir. 2008); Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray Rsrv. v. State of Utah, 114 F.3d 1513, 1522 n.2 (10th Cir. 1997). This precedent forecloses Elite's 60(b)(6) claim here.