From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. Attorney General of State

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 23, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-97 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 23, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-97.

January 23, 2008


ORDER


AND NOW, this 23rd day of January, 2008, after the Petitioner, Salvatore Ross, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge, and after Petitioner filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, upon consideration of the objections filed by Petitioner, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the habeas petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is dismissed;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the parties desire to appeal from this Order they must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

Ross v. Attorney General of State

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 23, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-97 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 23, 2008)
Case details for

Ross v. Attorney General of State

Case Details

Full title:SALVATORE ROSS, Petitioner v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 23, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-97 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 23, 2008)

Citing Cases

Tennyson v. Klopotoski

Bousley v. U.S., 523 U.S. 614, 626-27 (1998) (Stevens, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) ("The…

Sullivan v. Capozza

Finally, it is a habeas petitioner's burden to show that the state court's decision was contrary to or an…