From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roseton Hills Sewage-Works Corp. v. Leitman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 9, 1979
69 A.D.2d 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

April 9, 1979


In a condemnation proceeding, the defendants Baldwin appeal from a final order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated July 11, 1978, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, fixed the compensation for the taking. Final order and judgment, modified, on the law, by adding a provision thereto awarding costs in the Supreme Court to the appellants, with costs to the respondent on this appeal. Trial Term erred only in not awarding costs to the appellants, pursuant to subdivision 2 of section 16 of the Condemnation Law, since no offer of compensation was made by respondent to the appellants prior to initiation of the condemnation proceeding. Mollen, P.J., Suozzi, O'Connor and Mangano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Roseton Hills Sewage-Works Corp. v. Leitman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 9, 1979
69 A.D.2d 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

Roseton Hills Sewage-Works Corp. v. Leitman

Case Details

Full title:ROSETON HILLS SEWAGE-WORKS CORP., Respondent, v. MIKE LEITMAN et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 9, 1979

Citations

69 A.D.2d 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Citing Cases

Village of Port Chester v. Marino

But the condemnor paid claimant $230,000 only, alleging that that was 100% of the village's highest approved…

Matter of New York City Transit Authority

The written offer may not be less than the condemnor's highest approved appraisal (EDPL 303, 304). One of the…