From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenweig v. Bauer

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Feb 1, 1901
34 Misc. 767 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)

Opinion

February, 1901.

W.S. Maddox, for appellants.

J. Bogart, for respondent.


This action is brought to recover $400 for work done upon four buildings situated on West One Hundred and Seventeenth street, in the city of New York, and for material furnished in connection with such work, and has been tried twice.

On the first trial the plaintiff recovered a judgment of $200, with costs, which was reversed by the Appellate Term (32 Misc. Rep. 714), on the ground that there was not sufficient proof of the plaintiff's damages or of the reasonable value of the work actually done by him under the contract. Upon the last trial such proof was furnished and abundantly supports the judgment which was rendered.

As I cannot discover that any error of law was committed upon the trial, I am of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

O'GORMAN and BLANCHARD, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Rosenweig v. Bauer

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Feb 1, 1901
34 Misc. 767 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)
Case details for

Rosenweig v. Bauer

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH ROSENWEIG, Respondent, v . ANNIE C. VON BAUER et al., Appellants

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Feb 1, 1901

Citations

34 Misc. 767 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)