From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenthal v. United Elec. Rys. Co. Two Cases

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Oct 26, 1951
83 A.2d 918 (R.I. 1951)

Opinion

Ex. Nos. 9194, 9195.

October 26, 1951, Decided

Edward F. Dwyer, Woonsocket, for plaintiffs.

Earl A. Sweeney, Frank J. McGee, Providence, for defendant.


PER CURIAM.

After our opinion in the above cases was filed, the defendant by leave of court filed a motion for reargument.

Having in mind that the defendant's exception under consideration was to the denial of its motion to direct a verdict, we have carefully re-examined the transcript with special reference to the reasons for reargument appearing in the instant motion. In our judgment they present no matter which was not fuly considered and passed upon in reaching the conclusion stated in our opinion.

Motion denied.


Summaries of

Rosenthal v. United Elec. Rys. Co. Two Cases

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Oct 26, 1951
83 A.2d 918 (R.I. 1951)
Case details for

Rosenthal v. United Elec. Rys. Co. Two Cases

Case Details

Full title:ROSENTHAL, P. A. v. UNITED ELECTRIC RYS. CO. (two cases)

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Date published: Oct 26, 1951

Citations

83 A.2d 918 (R.I. 1951)
79 R.I. 16
1951 R.I. LEXIS 119