From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenfeld v. Hackett

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 15, 2013
504 F. App'x 646 (9th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 11-36055 D.C. No. 6:07-cv-06209-HO

01-15-2013

MARIA CATERINA ROSENFELD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAMES HACKETT, Linn Benton Housin Authority; LINN-BENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY, Defendants - Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Michael R. Hogan, District Judge, Presiding

Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Maria Caterina Rosenfeld appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing her action alleging violations of the Fair Housing Amendments Act and state law for failure to prosecute. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Al-Torki v. Kaempen, 78 F.3d 1381, 1384 (9th Cir. 1996). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Rosenfeld's action for failure to prosecute after Rosenfeld refused to go forward with trial due to her objections to the district court's evidentiary rulings. See id. (discussing factors to guide the court's decision whether to dismiss for failure to prosecute).

Because we affirm the district court's dismissal for failure to prosecute, we do not consider Rosenfeld's challenges to the district court's interlocutory orders. See id. at 1386 ("[I]nterlocutory orders, generally appealable after final judgment, are not appealable after a dismissal for failure to prosecute[.]").

Rosenfeld's motion to stay proceedings, filed on October 9, 2012, is denied.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Rosenfeld v. Hackett

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 15, 2013
504 F. App'x 646 (9th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Rosenfeld v. Hackett

Case Details

Full title:MARIA CATERINA ROSENFELD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAMES HACKETT, Linn…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 15, 2013

Citations

504 F. App'x 646 (9th Cir. 2013)