From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenfeld v. Community School District # 28

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 17, 2006
25 A.D.3d 596 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2004-06452.

January 17, 2006.

In an application, in effect, to vacate an arbitration award, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J.), dated June 4, 2004, which denied his motion, in effect, for leave to reargue his application.

Ronald Cohen, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Kristin M. Helmers and Janet L. Zaleon of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Schmidt, J.P., Mastro, Spolzino and Covello, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The plaintiff's motion was, in effect, one for leave to reargue. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed, as no appeal lies from the denial of reargument ( see Pacella v. Whiteman Osterman Hanna, 14 AD3d 545; Amsler v. Verrilli, 203 AD2d 403).


Summaries of

Rosenfeld v. Community School District # 28

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 17, 2006
25 A.D.3d 596 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Rosenfeld v. Community School District # 28

Case Details

Full title:ALAN ROSENFELD, Appellant, v. COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT #28 et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 17, 2006

Citations

25 A.D.3d 596 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 344
806 N.Y.S.2d 888

Citing Cases

Stephanie v. Roman

Since the plaintiffs neither moved for, nor were granted, a preliminary injunction, the requirement of an…

Stephanie v. Julio Reyes

Ordered that the motion is granted; it is further, Ordered that the appeal from the order dated March 28,…