From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosendale v. Phillips

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 22, 1937
87 F.2d 454 (2d Cir. 1937)

Opinion

No. 281.

January 22, 1937.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

Suit by Frank Rosendale and others against Frederick C. Phillips and others. From an order denying a motion for an injunction pendente lite and directing one Hunter, not a party to the suit, to account to the defendants for certain records and property, the complainants appeal.

Reversed, and complaint dismissed.

Frederick E. Goldsmith and Louis E. Felix, both of New York City, for appellants.

William L. Standard, of New York City, for appellees.

Before SWAN, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.


The order appealed from must be reversed and the bill dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The bill of complaint is wholly devoid of jurisdictional allegations. It is brought by the Marine Firemen's Oilers' and Watertenders' Union of the Atlantic and Gulf, an unincorporated membership association, and certain of its officers and members, as plaintiffs, against other members of the union, as defendants. There is no allegation that all the plaintiffs are of different citizenship than all the defendants, nor is there any allegation as to the amount involved. On the argument before this court it was conceded that some of the members of the plaintiff union were citizens of the same state as some of the defendants. This excludes the possibility of basing jurisdiction on diverse citizenship, and there can be no other ground. Levering Garrigues Co. v. Morrin, 61 F.2d 115 (C.C.A.2), cited with apparent approval in Puerto Rico v. Russell Co., 288 U.S. 476, 480, 53 S.Ct. 447, 448, 77 L.Ed. 903; Ex parte Edelstein, 30 F.2d 636 (C.C.A. 2), certiorari denied Edelstein v. Goddard, 279 U.S. 851, 49 S.Ct. 347, 73 L.Ed. 994. Hence no amendment of the complaint could cure its defective allegations. The decree must be reversed and the complaint dismissed for want of jurisdiction. It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Rosendale v. Phillips

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 22, 1937
87 F.2d 454 (2d Cir. 1937)
Case details for

Rosendale v. Phillips

Case Details

Full title:ROSENDALE et al. v. PHILLIPS et al

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Jan 22, 1937

Citations

87 F.2d 454 (2d Cir. 1937)

Citing Cases

Suchem, Inc. v. Central Aguirre Sugar Co.

hat there is no diversity jurisdiction in this case, since Suchem, Inc., the plaintiff, is a corporation…

Steele v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New York

Consequently, the district court lacked jurisdiction of this claim also. Levering Garrigues Co. v. Morris, 2…