From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenblum v. Tatham

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A
Mar 14, 1956
86 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 1956)

Opinion

March 14, 1956.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Vincent C. Giblin, Judge.

Courshon Fink, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Joe Creel, Miami, for appellees.


This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellees to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the Rules of this court, 30 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be and the same is hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

DREW, C.J., and TERRELL, HOBSON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rosenblum v. Tatham

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A
Mar 14, 1956
86 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 1956)
Case details for

Rosenblum v. Tatham

Case Details

Full title:MAX ROSENBLUM, A/K/A MAX A. ROSENBLUM, APPELLANT, v. EARMIA A. TATHAM…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida. Division A

Date published: Mar 14, 1956

Citations

86 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 1956)