Rosenberg v. Lappin

Full title: JORDAN ROSENBERG, Plaintiff, v. HARLEY G. LAPPIN, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Oct 1, 2010

CV 09-1722-PA (SH) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2010)

Opinion

JORDAN ROSENBERG, Plaintiff, v. HARLEY G. LAPPIN, et al., Defendants. No. CV 09-1722-PA (SH). United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. October 1, 2010.

          ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          PERCY ANDERSON, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(c), the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint and other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo determination of the Report and Recommendation.

         IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that an Order be entered (1) approving and adopting the Report and Recommendation, (2) granting Defendant U.S.'s Motion to Dismiss; (3) dismissing Plaintiff's common law tort claims (Claims 1.2, 1.3, 2.2, 2.3, and 3.2.); (4) dismissing the U.S. from the action, and; (5) dismissing the injunctive relief portions of Claims 4.2 and 5.2.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve forthwith a copy of this Order Adopting and the Order of this date on the Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant.