From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenberg v. Gray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1931
234 App. Div. 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

December, 1931.


Order, as resettled, reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, to the extent of granting the plaintiff summary judgment for the amount due upon the instruments in question, with interest from their dates of maturity respectively, the attorney's fees being deemed waived. The defendant presented no proof sufficient to entitle him to defend this action within rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rosenberg v. Gray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1931
234 App. Div. 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Rosenberg v. Gray

Case Details

Full title:ANNABEL ROSENBERG, Appellant, v. WILLIAM J. GRAY, Doing Business under the…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1931

Citations

234 App. Div. 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)