Rosenberg v. Feigin

Full title: HERBERT ROSENBERG, Appellant, v. EMANUEL V. FEIGIN, Respondent

Court: Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One

Date published: Mar 26, 1952

110 Cal.App.2d 56 (Cal. Ct. App. 1952)

241 P.2d 1043

Opinion

Docket No. 18580.

March 26, 1952.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying motion to set aside ruling sustaining demurrer to third amended complaint. Julius V. Patrosso, Judge. Appeal from order dismissed.

Edward B. Freed for Appellant.

Ralph N. Highsmith and Henry E. Kappler for Respondent.

HANSON, J. pro tem.

[1] The appeal is from an order denying a motion to set aside a ruling which sustained a demurrer to the third amended complaint. The order is not an appealable order (Code Civ. Proc., § 963; Title Ins. Trust Co. v. California Dev. Co., 159 Cal. 484 [ 114 P. 838]).

The appeal is dismissed.

White, P.J., and Doran, J., concurred.