From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosen v. Sporn

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 14, 2021
21-CV-683 (JPC) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 14, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-683 (JPC)

09-14-2021

DAVID ROSEN and SHARON ROSEN, Plaintiffs, v. KALMAN SPORN and LEAH SPORN SAVITT Defendants.


ORDER

JOHN P. CRONAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

On July 6, 2021-after Plaintiffs' counsel passed away-the Court ordered Plaintiffs by September 6, 2021, to either (1) retain substitute counsel or (2) inform the Court by letter that they wish to proceed pro se. Dkt. 38. The Court explained that if Plaintiff failed to comply, the complaint would be dismissed without prejudice without further notice. Id. Plaintiffs failed to comply with that Order.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 authorizes a court to dismiss an action for failure to prosecute or comply with an order of the Court. Fed R. Civ. P. 41(b); see LeSane v. Hall's Sec. Analyst, Inc., 239 F.3d 206, 209 (2d Cir. 2001) (“[I]t is unquestioned that Rule 41(b) also gives the district court authority to dismiss a plaintiff's case sua sponte for failure to prosecute ....”). Given Plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's July 6, 2021 Order, the Court dismisses without prejudice this action under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case and mail a copy of this Order to the following addresses:

Law Office of N. Ari Weisbrot LLC

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rosen v. Sporn

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 14, 2021
21-CV-683 (JPC) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Rosen v. Sporn

Case Details

Full title:DAVID ROSEN and SHARON ROSEN, Plaintiffs, v. KALMAN SPORN and LEAH SPORN…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 14, 2021

Citations

21-CV-683 (JPC) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 14, 2021)