From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosen v. Rosen

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 4, 1990
554 So. 2d 1212 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-2596.

January 4, 1990.

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Broward County; John T. Luzzo, Judge.

Karen Coolman Amlong of Amlong Amlong, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Alan H. Konigsburg of Alan H. Konigsburg, P.A., Hollywood, for appellee.


AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

GARRETT, J., concurs specially with opinion.


The wife sought a money judgment for rehabilitative alimony arrears. Because the wife also owed money to the husband, the trial judge gave the husband an offset. But the husband still owes the wife a special equity award. The setoff could have been applied against either the arrears or the award. I would have preferred that the trial judge had protected the established sanctity of an alimony award. See Chappell v. Chappell, 253 So.2d 281, 287 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971). However, this court can find no abuse of discretion when the trial judge's decision amounts to six of one, half a dozen of another.


Summaries of

Rosen v. Rosen

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 4, 1990
554 So. 2d 1212 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Rosen v. Rosen

Case Details

Full title:ELLEN JOAN ROSEN, APPELLANT, v. RICHARD MARK ROSEN, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 4, 1990

Citations

554 So. 2d 1212 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)