From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roseman v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Feb 5, 2016
SC: 151790 (Mich. Feb. 5, 2016)

Opinion

SC: 151790

02-05-2016

MARK A. ROSEMAN and LUZATER ROSEMAN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF DETROIT, Defendant, and MUKASH PATEL, DENNIS STOKES, and WILLIAM MCPHERSON Defendants-Appellants.


Order

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices COA: 314650
Wayne CC: 11-011214-NO

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 7, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the parties to file supplemental briefs, within 28 days of the date of this order, addressing whether the plaintiffs' claims are barred by the exclusive remedy provision of the Worker's Disability Compensation Act (WDCA). See MCL 418.131(1); Harris v Vernier, 242 Mich App 306, 316 (2000) (exclusive remedy provision of the WDCA implicates subject matter jurisdiction and may be raised at any time).

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 5, 2016

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Roseman v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Feb 5, 2016
SC: 151790 (Mich. Feb. 5, 2016)
Case details for

Roseman v. City of Detroit

Case Details

Full title:MARK A. ROSEMAN and LUZATER ROSEMAN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Feb 5, 2016

Citations

SC: 151790 (Mich. Feb. 5, 2016)