From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roseburg Forest Products v. Martin

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 6, 1994
872 P.2d 446 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

92-10346; CA A80804

Argued and submitted April 13, 1994.

Vacated in part; otherwise affirmed May 4, 1994. Petitioner's motion for reconsideration filed May 6, 1994. Allowed by opinion August 3, 1994. See 129 Or. App. 314 (1994)

Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board.

Adam T. Stamper argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief were Peter L. Deuel and Cowling Heysell.

Pamela A. Schultz argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Landau, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Board's order that employer reprocess claim vacated; otherwise affirmed.


Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board that ordered it to reprocess claimant's claim to initial closure. We agree with employer that it had already properly processed the claim to closure by its notice of closure dated March 28, 1991. All issues between the parties were addressed and no further processing is required.

Board's order that employer reprocess the claim vacated; otherwise affirmed.


Summaries of

Roseburg Forest Products v. Martin

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 6, 1994
872 P.2d 446 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Roseburg Forest Products v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Compensation of Donald Martin, Claimant. ROSEBURG…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: May 6, 1994

Citations

872 P.2d 446 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)
872 P.2d 446

Citing Cases

Roseburg Forest Products v. Martin

92-10346; CA A80804On petitioner's motion for reconsideration filed May 6, 1994 Reconsideration allowed;…