From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roseborough v. City of Trotwood

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, Dayton
Sep 26, 2006
Case No. 3:06-cv-129 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 26, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 3:06-cv-129.

September 26, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS


On September 1, 2006, United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz recommended (Doc. No. 16) that:

1. Plaintiff Robert Roseborough's federal claim for loss of consortium be dismissed with prejudice; and

2. The Trotwood Defendants' Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings as to Robert Roseborough's state claim for loss of consortium be denied without reaching the merits on the current briefing.

No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendations and the time for objecting expired on September 21, 2006. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendations are adopted.


Summaries of

Roseborough v. City of Trotwood

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, Dayton
Sep 26, 2006
Case No. 3:06-cv-129 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 26, 2006)
Case details for

Roseborough v. City of Trotwood

Case Details

Full title:ROBIN ROSEBOROUGH, et al., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF TROTWOOD, OHIO, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, Dayton

Date published: Sep 26, 2006

Citations

Case No. 3:06-cv-129 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 26, 2006)