From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rose v. Yorklyn Construction Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

January, 1934.


Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event, upon the ground that plaintiffs made out a cause of action. ( Hyland v. Cobb, 252 N.Y. 325; Dickson v. McCoy, 39 id. 400; Buchanan v. Stout, 139 App. Div. 204; Quilty v. Battie, 135 N.Y. 201; Brice v. Bauer, 108 id. 428; Keenan v. Gutta Percha Manfg. Co., 46 Hun, 544; Hahnke v. Friederich, 140 N.Y. 224; Holzer v. Rosenberg, 209 App. Div. 823.) Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rose v. Yorklyn Construction Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

Rose v. Yorklyn Construction Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN ROSE, by WILLIAM ROSE, His Guardian ad Litem, and WILLIAM ROSE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1934

Citations

241 App. Div. 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)