From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rose v. The Coleman Co.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 19, 2024
2:24-cv-01296-AB-MAR (C.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-01296-AB-MAR

03-19-2024

Rita Rose v. The Coleman Company, Inc.


PRESENT: THE HONORABLE ANDRE BIROTTE JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: [In Chambers] ORDER REMANDNG ACTION FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

On March 6, 2024, the Court issued to Defendant an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the ground that Defendant did not establish either that the amount in controversy was satisfied or that there was complete diversity. (Dkt. No.l 1.) Defendant's deadline to respond was March 13. As of the date of this Order, Defendant has not responded. Meanwhile, Plaintiff did respond, representing that the damages Plaintiff is seeking do not exceed $74,999. (Dkt. No. 12.) The Court's OSC stated that the Court would remand the action if Defendant did not timely file an Amended Notice of Removal or adequately allege the Court's jurisdiction.

Accordingly, the Court hereby REMANDS this action to the State Court from which it was removed.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Rose v. The Coleman Co.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 19, 2024
2:24-cv-01296-AB-MAR (C.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2024)
Case details for

Rose v. The Coleman Co.

Case Details

Full title:Rita Rose v. The Coleman Company, Inc.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 19, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-01296-AB-MAR (C.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2024)