From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rose v. Cummings

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION
Feb 23, 2016
No. 3:13CV00253-JLH-JJV (E.D. Ark. Feb. 23, 2016)

Opinion

No. 3:13CV00253-JLH-JJV

02-23-2016

GREGORY ROSE PLAINTIFF v. ELONZO CUMMINGS, Jailer, Mississippi County Jail DEFENDANT


JUDGMENT

On the 22nd day of February, 2016, this action came before the Court for trial by jury. The plaintiff, Gregory Rose, appeared in person and with his lawyer, Glenn Lovett, Jr. The defendant, Elonzo Cummings, appeared in person and with his lawyers, Thomas J. Diaz and Joshua Derek Standerfer. Both parties announced ready for trial. A jury of twelve was duly selected and sworn. After all of the evidence had been received and the jury had been duly instructed on the law, on February 23, 2016, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant, Elonzo Cummings. Judgment is therefore entered in favor of Elonzo Cummings on the claims of Gregory Rose. The complaint of Gregory Rose is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of February, 2016.

/s/_________

J. LEON HOLMES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Rose v. Cummings

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION
Feb 23, 2016
No. 3:13CV00253-JLH-JJV (E.D. Ark. Feb. 23, 2016)
Case details for

Rose v. Cummings

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY ROSE PLAINTIFF v. ELONZO CUMMINGS, Jailer, Mississippi County Jail…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION

Date published: Feb 23, 2016

Citations

No. 3:13CV00253-JLH-JJV (E.D. Ark. Feb. 23, 2016)