From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rose v. County

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division
Feb 23, 2006
Case Number 01-10337-BC (E.D. Mich. Feb. 23, 2006)

Opinion

Case Number 01-10337-BC.

February 23, 2006


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF PARTY


On February 9, 2006, a statement of the fact of death was filed, indicating plaintiff Donna Quarles has passed away. Donna Quarles' mother, Lizzie Quarles, seeks to substitute herself in her daughter's place. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25 allows the court to substitute "the proper parties" where death of a party does not extinguish the claim. Fed.R.Civ.P. 25(a)(1). As the defendants note, a section 1983 claim is not extinguished by death. See Robertson v. Wegmann, 436 U.S. 584, 588 (1978); Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.2921. However, the movant has not established that Lizzie Quarles qualifies as a proper party. The capacity of an individual to sue is "determined by the law of the individual's domicile." Fed.R.Civ.P. 17(b). In Michigan, a claim for damages resulting from injury survives the death of the injured person, see Mich. Comp. Laws. § 600.2921, but such claims may only be brought "by, and in the name of, the personal representative of the estate of the deceased person." Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.2922(2). Until Lizzie Quarles can show that she has been named a personal representative of her daughter's estate, the Court is unable to grant the motion. Dietrich v. Burrows, 164 F.R.D. 220, 222 (N.D. Ohio 1995) (finding that son of plaintiff "was unable to move to substitute himself as plaintiff until . . . he became [his father's] personal representative"). See also Diehl v. United States, 438 F.2d 705, 710-11 (5th Cir. 1971) (holding that substitute must be valid successor in interest under state law).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the motion for substitution of party [dkt # 218] is DENIED without prejudice.


Summaries of

Rose v. County

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division
Feb 23, 2006
Case Number 01-10337-BC (E.D. Mich. Feb. 23, 2006)
Case details for

Rose v. County

Case Details

Full title:LINDA ROSE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAGINAW COUNTY, SAGINAW COUNTY…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division

Date published: Feb 23, 2006

Citations

Case Number 01-10337-BC (E.D. Mich. Feb. 23, 2006)