From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rose v. City of Brady

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Aug 26, 2009
No. 03-09-00260-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 26, 2009)

Opinion

No. 03-09-00260-CV

Filed: August 26, 2009.

Appealed from the District Court of Mcculloch County, 198th Judicial District, No. 2008143, Honorable Emil Karl Prohl, Judge Presiding.

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution.

Before Chief Justice JONES, Justices WALDROP and HENSON.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


The appellant's brief was due on July 9, 2009. On July 21, 2009, this Court notified appellant that his brief was overdue and that a failure to file a proper motion for extension of time by July 31, 2009, would result in the dismissal of this appeal for want of prosecution. To date, the appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

On May 11, 2009, the appellant filed a motion to extend time to file his notice of appeal. Because the filing fee has not been paid and no certificate of conference has been filed, see Tex. R. App. P. 10.1(a)(5), the motion remains pending and is hereby dismissed as moot.


Summaries of

Rose v. City of Brady

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Aug 26, 2009
No. 03-09-00260-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 26, 2009)
Case details for

Rose v. City of Brady

Case Details

Full title:Troy Rose, Appellant v. City of Brady, Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Aug 26, 2009

Citations

No. 03-09-00260-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 26, 2009)