From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rose v. Borca

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 20, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-01290 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2015)

Opinion

No. 2:15-cv-01290 KJN P

08-20-2015

WILLIAM P. ROSE, Plaintiff, v. DANILLE BORCA, Defendant.


ORDER and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed July 1, 2015, the undersigned ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 form necessary to effect service on defendant Danille Borca. That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall appoint a district judge in this action.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: August 20, 2015

/s/_________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
/rose1290.fusm


Summaries of

Rose v. Borca

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 20, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-01290 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2015)
Case details for

Rose v. Borca

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM P. ROSE, Plaintiff, v. DANILLE BORCA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 20, 2015

Citations

No. 2:15-cv-01290 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2015)