From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosberg v. State

United States District Court, District of Nebraska
Jun 18, 2024
8:24CV40 (D. Neb. Jun. 18, 2024)

Opinion

8:24CV40

06-18-2024

PAUL A. ROSBERG, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEBRASKA, PAUL A. VAUGHN, JAMES KUBE, MARK JOHNSON, and MARK KOZISEK, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Joseph F. Bataillon Senior United States District Judge

Plaintiff Paul A. Rosberg, a non-prisoner, filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Filing No. 2. Upon review of Plaintiff's Motion, the Court finds that Plaintiff is financially eligible to proceed in forma pauperis.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in his case will be for the Court to conduct an initial review of his claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business.


Summaries of

Rosberg v. State

United States District Court, District of Nebraska
Jun 18, 2024
8:24CV40 (D. Neb. Jun. 18, 2024)
Case details for

Rosberg v. State

Case Details

Full title:PAUL A. ROSBERG, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEBRASKA, PAUL A. VAUGHN, JAMES…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nebraska

Date published: Jun 18, 2024

Citations

8:24CV40 (D. Neb. Jun. 18, 2024)