From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosasen v. Kingdom of Nor.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 10, 2022
2:21-cv-06811-JWH (SP) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-06811-JWH (SP)

02-10-2022

MARLON ABRAHAM ROSASEN, et al. v. KINGDOM OF NORWAY, et al.


Present: The Honorable Sheri Pym, United States Magistrate Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings:(In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal of Minor Plaintiffs' Claims

On August 24, 2021, plaintiff filed a Motion for Appointment as Guardian Ad Litem (“GAL”) for his children D.T.R. and L.A.R. who are also named plaintiffs. The court denied the motion on September 21, 2021, finding that plaintiff would have a potential conflict of interest in representing his children in this case. The court ordered plaintiff to propose an alternative, non-conflicted, and disinterested GAL by October 22, 2021.

On October 22, 2021, plaintiff filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the court's September 21, 2021 order. The court denied reconsideration on December 2, 2021. In its order, the court also noted that the minor plaintiffs must be represented by counsel. The court stated:

if plaintiffs wish to proceed with the minor plaintiffs' claims, within 21 days, that is, by December 23, 2021: (1) plaintiffs must retain counsel for the minor plaintiffs; (2) the attorney or attorneys for the minor plaintiffs must file notices of their appearance in this case; and (3) plaintiffs' counsel must file petitions for appointment of a non-conflicted guardian ad litem for the minor plaintiffs. Alternatively, the minor plaintiffs may voluntarily dismiss their claims without prejudice.

Docket no. 20. To date, plaintiff has not complied with these instructions.

Accordingly, the court orders plaintiff to show cause why the claims raised on behalf of the minor plaintiffs should not be dismissed without prejudice. See Johns v. Cnty. of San Diego, 114 F.3d 874, 877-78 (9th Cir. 1997) (parent cannot bring action on behalf of minor without retaining counsel). Plaintiff must file a response to this order to show cause no later than February 25, 2022. The court warns plaintiff that failure to respond to this order to show cause may result in the dismissal of the minor plaintiffs' claims without further notice to plaintiff.


Summaries of

Rosasen v. Kingdom of Nor.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 10, 2022
2:21-cv-06811-JWH (SP) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Rosasen v. Kingdom of Nor.

Case Details

Full title:MARLON ABRAHAM ROSASEN, et al. v. KINGDOM OF NORWAY, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Feb 10, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-06811-JWH (SP) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2022)