Opinion
2:23-cv-0617 WBS AC P
07-18-2023
MARIO ROSAS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.
ORDER
WILLIAM B. SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On June 15, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 6. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 7.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed June 15, 2023 (ECF No. 6), are adopted in full;
2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is denied;
3. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253; and
4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.