From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosas v. United States

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Sep 22, 2023
Civil Action 4:20cv406 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 22, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 4:20cv406 CRIMINAL ACTION 4:17cr140(2)

09-22-2023

LILIANA ROSAS, #27323-078 v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

MARCIA A. CRONE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Aileen Goldman Durrett, who issued a Report and Recommendation (#11) concluding that the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 should be denied and dismissed with prejudice. No objections were timely filed.

The Court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and adopts the same as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

It is accordingly ORDERED that Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (#1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED, and the case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. All motions by either party not previously ruled upon are DENIED.


Summaries of

Rosas v. United States

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Sep 22, 2023
Civil Action 4:20cv406 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 22, 2023)
Case details for

Rosas v. United States

Case Details

Full title:LILIANA ROSAS, #27323-078 v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas

Date published: Sep 22, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 4:20cv406 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 22, 2023)