From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosario v. Public Service Co-Ordinated Transport

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 14, 1945
270 App. Div. 169 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)

Opinion

December 14, 1945.

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County, LEVY, J.

Thomas G. Prioleau for appellant appearing specially.

Hyman A. Hochman of counsel ( Albert W. Richman, attorney), for respondent.


The motion to vacate service of summons should have been granted.

The proof established that defendant, a foreign corporation, was not doing business in this State at the time of service. At most, it owned the stock of a subsidiary corporation which carried on business here.

Such stock ownership, without further activity, did not bring the parent company within the State in the sense of transacting its own business here ( People's Tobacco Co. v. Am. Tobacco Co., 246 U.S. 79; Cannon Mfg. Co. v. Cudahy Co., 267 U.S. 333; Compania Mexicana v. Compania Metropolitana, 250 N.Y. 203; Yeckes-Eichenbaum, Inc., v. McCarthy, 290 N.Y. 437).

This case is unlike those relied on by plaintiff, where the foreign corporation operated within the State but claimed that it did so as agent of a domestic corporation ( Atlantic Greyhound Lines v. Metz, 70 F.2d 166), or where the subsidiary was a mere name or device to give the appearance of transacting business which in fact was being carried on by the parent company. (See Mas v. Orange-Crush Co., 99 F.2d 675.)

The order should be reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements, and the motion to confirm the report of the referee and to vacate the service granted.

MARTIN, P.J., TOWNLEY, DORE, COHN and CALLAHAN, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion to confirm the report of the referee and to vacate the service granted.


Summaries of

Rosario v. Public Service Co-Ordinated Transport

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 14, 1945
270 App. Div. 169 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)
Case details for

Rosario v. Public Service Co-Ordinated Transport

Case Details

Full title:PURA ROSARIO, as Administratrix of the Estate of ENRIQUE ROSARIO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 14, 1945

Citations

270 App. Div. 169 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)
59 N.Y.S.2d 50

Citing Cases

Walker Sons v. Lehigh Coal Co.

None of these corporations has been held out as agents of defendant nor has it been shown that they conduct…

Krane v. Gravely Motor Plow Cultivator Co.

The motion by defendant-appellant, a foreign corporation, should have been granted to set aside the service…