From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosario v. Harlow

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 21, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-305 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 21, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-305

11-21-2012

NATHAN ROSARIO, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL HARLOW, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 21ST day of ________ NOVEMBER ________, 2012, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, the parties' briefs, United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge's Report and Recommendation, and Petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing; and
3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.

________

ANITA B. BRODY, J.

Copies VIA ECF on ______ to: Copies MAILED on _______ to: O:\ABB 2012\L - Z\Rosario v. Harlow Habeas Order.wpd


Summaries of

Rosario v. Harlow

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 21, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-305 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Rosario v. Harlow

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN ROSARIO, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL HARLOW, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 21, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-305 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 21, 2012)