From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosales v. Pandora's Pizza, Inc.

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Jul 16, 2021
18-CV-2326 JLS (BLM) (S.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2021)

Opinion

18-CV-2326 JLS (BLM)

07-16-2021

OMAR ROSALES, Plaintiff, v. PANDORA'S PIZZA, INC., Defendant.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE

Hon. Janis L. Sammartino United States District Judge

On June 14, 2021, the Court issued an Order (“Order, ” ECF No. 19) ordering Plaintiff Omar Rosales to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of standing and for failure to comply with the Local Rules of Practice for persons appearing without an attorney. The Court ordered Plaintiff to file a written response within thirty days and warned that “ [f]ailure to respond timely will result in dismissal for lack of standing. ” Order at 7 (emphasis in original). Although more than thirty days have elapsed since the electronic docketing of the Order, Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Order. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this action in its entirety for lack of standing, failure to comply with the Order, and for all the reasons set forth in the Court's June 14, 2021 Order (ECF No. 19). The Clerk of the Court SHALL CLOSE the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rosales v. Pandora's Pizza, Inc.

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Jul 16, 2021
18-CV-2326 JLS (BLM) (S.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Rosales v. Pandora's Pizza, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:OMAR ROSALES, Plaintiff, v. PANDORA'S PIZZA, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Jul 16, 2021

Citations

18-CV-2326 JLS (BLM) (S.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2021)