From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 18, 2003
266 Conn. 906 (Conn. 2003)

Opinion

Decided September 18, 2003


The petition for certification by the New York Times Company, Globe Newspaper Company, Inc., and the Washington Post Company for appeal from the Appellate Court, 77 Conn. App. 690 (AC 23014, AC 23015, AC 23016, AC 23017, AC 23069, AC 23078, AC 23079, AC 23161), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly granted the application to create a new file?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17060.

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

James S. Rollins and Kimberly M. White, in support of the petition.

John B. Farley, Joseph T. Sweeney, Ralph W. Johnson III, James V. Somers, James F. Stapleton, John F. Conway and W. Glen Pierson, in opposition.


Summaries of

Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 18, 2003
266 Conn. 906 (Conn. 2003)
Case details for

Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE ROSADO ET AL. v. BRIDGEPORT ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESAN CORPORATION ET…

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Sep 18, 2003

Citations

266 Conn. 906 (Conn. 2003)
832 A.2d 71
832 A.2d 72

Citing Cases

Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.

See Hartford Courant Co. v. Pellegrino, supra, 290 F. Sup. 2d 270 ("[t]he court . . . believes that a…

Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman

We subsequently granted the newspapers' petitions for certification to appeal limited to the following…