From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosa v. Rosen Paramount Glass Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 21, 2012
11 Civ. 02123 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2012)

Opinion

11 Civ. 02123 (AJN)

12-21-2012

ROGELIO ROSA, Plaintiff, v. ROSEN PARAMOUNT GLASS CO., INC. AND STANLEY ROSEN, Defendants.


ORDER

ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:

On October 12, 2012, the magistrate judge to whom this case has been referred for general pretrial management issued a report and recommendation that the case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. In short, the magistrate judge set a September 14, 2012, date by which Plaintiff was to appear by new counsel or appear pro se. Plaintiff has done neither and, indeed, has not responded in any way to the report and recommendation that the case be dismissed for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b). See Harding v. Goord, 135 Fed. Appx. 488, at *2 (2d Cir, 2005) (noting that, although explicitly authorized by the text of the rule, district courts have the authority to dismiss cases sua sponte for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b)). The Court therefore adopts the report and recommendation. This case is dismissed for failure to prosecute. Dated: December 21, 2012

New York, New York

_______________

ALISON J. NATHAN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rosa v. Rosen Paramount Glass Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 21, 2012
11 Civ. 02123 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Rosa v. Rosen Paramount Glass Co.

Case Details

Full title:ROGELIO ROSA, Plaintiff, v. ROSEN PARAMOUNT GLASS CO., INC. AND STANLEY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Dec 21, 2012

Citations

11 Civ. 02123 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2012)