From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosa v. 42 Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 27, 1998
254 A.D.2d 213 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 27, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Friedman, J.).


The six-month delay in defendant's appearance did not prejudice plaintiff so as to preclude vacatur of a default caused by defendant's insurer's failure to interpose an answer while also failing to disclaim coverage ( see, Price v. Polisner, 172 A.D.2d 422; see also, Barajas v. Toll Bros., 247 A.D.2d 242). Meritorious defenses are raised.

Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Rosa v. 42 Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 27, 1998
254 A.D.2d 213 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Rosa v. 42 Holding Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JUANA ROSA, Respondent, v. 42 HOLDING CORP., Appellant. JUANA ROSA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 27, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 213 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 573

Citing Cases

Whittemore v. Yeo

rom engaging counsel to respond is inadequate ( see e.g. Flannery v. Stewart, 22 A.D.2d 786, 254 N.Y.S.2d 130…

Scott v. Fontana [1st Dept 2000

SULLIVAN, J.P., MAZZARELLI, WALLACH, RUBIN, ANDRIAS, JJ. Absent any showing of prejudice caused by…