From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roor Int'l BV v. Smoke & Vapor

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Sep 8, 2019
Civil Action No.: 4:18-cv-711-ALM-KPJ (E.D. Tex. Sep. 8, 2019)

Opinion

Civil Action No.: 4:18-cv-711-ALM-KPJ

09-08-2019

ROOR INTERNATIONAL BV AND SREAM, INC., Plaintiffs, v. SMOKE & VAPOR and JOHN DOE, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On August 12, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered proposed findings of fact and recommendations (Dkt. #32) that Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Class Action Counterclaims (Dkt. #20) be denied.

Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no timely objections being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Class Action Counterclaims (Dkt. #20) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 8th day of September, 2019.

/s/_________

AMOS L. MAZZANT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Roor Int'l BV v. Smoke & Vapor

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Sep 8, 2019
Civil Action No.: 4:18-cv-711-ALM-KPJ (E.D. Tex. Sep. 8, 2019)
Case details for

Roor Int'l BV v. Smoke & Vapor

Case Details

Full title:ROOR INTERNATIONAL BV AND SREAM, INC., Plaintiffs, v. SMOKE & VAPOR and…

Court:United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 8, 2019

Citations

Civil Action No.: 4:18-cv-711-ALM-KPJ (E.D. Tex. Sep. 8, 2019)