From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rooks v. New Prime, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sep 30, 2014
441 S.W.3d 153 (E.D. Mo. 2014)

Opinion

No. ED 100626.

2014-09-30

Glenda ROOKS, Appellant, v. NEW PRIME, INC., and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.

Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission.Bryan E. Brody, Gusdorf Law Firm, LLC, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.Larry R. Ruhmann, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission.
Bryan E. Brody, Gusdorf Law Firm, LLC, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Larry R. Ruhmann, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J. ORDER
PER CURIAM.

Glenda Rooks (“Claimant”) appeals from the decision of the Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) that dismissed Claimant's application for review pursuant to Section 288.200, RSMo, because it was untimely. Claimant had been requesting review of the Appeals Tribunal's decision denying her unemployment benefits because Claimant voluntarily separated from work without good cause attributable to the work or the employer. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Rooks v. New Prime, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sep 30, 2014
441 S.W.3d 153 (E.D. Mo. 2014)
Case details for

Rooks v. New Prime, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Glenda ROOKS, Appellant, v. NEW PRIME, INC., and Division of Employment…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Date published: Sep 30, 2014

Citations

441 S.W.3d 153 (E.D. Mo. 2014)