From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rookard v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Apr 29, 1954
212 F.2d 464 (D.C. Cir. 1954)

Opinion

No. 11622.

Argued April 21, 1954.

Decided April 29, 1954.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

Mr. Arthur Rookard filed a brief pro se.

Mr. Samuel J. L'Hommedieu, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U.S. Atty., and William J. Peck, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., at time brief was filed, were on the brief, for appellee. Messrs. Lewis A. Carroll and E. Riley Casey, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., entered appearances for appellee. Messrs. Charles M. Irelan, U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., at time record was filed, and William R. Glendon, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., at time record was filed, also entered appearances for appellee.

Mr. Richard W. Galiher, Washington, D.C., amicus curiæ, appointed by this Court.

Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER, and FAHY, Circuit Judges.


Appellant complains of denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 from a conviction and sentence for grand larceny. We find no error.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Rookard v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Apr 29, 1954
212 F.2d 464 (D.C. Cir. 1954)
Case details for

Rookard v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Arthur ROOKARD, Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Apr 29, 1954

Citations

212 F.2d 464 (D.C. Cir. 1954)

Citing Cases

Seihoon v. Levy

"plaintiff is not to be denied adjustment of status as a displaced person upon the theory that an intention…