From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ronel-Bennett v. Consol. Edison Co. of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 24, 1989
149 A.D.2d 678 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

April 24, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Golden, J.).


Ordered that the order is modified, by adding thereto a provision granting the defendant an additional 45 days within which to complete discovery; and as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and the defendant's time to complete discovery is extended until 45 days after service upon it of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry.

While we discern no improvident exercise of discretion in the court's denial of the defendant's motion (see generally, Matter of Long Is. Light. Co. v. Assessor of Town of Brookhaven, 122 A.D.2d 794; Easley v. Van Dyke, 110 A.D.2d 967), in view of the peculiar factual circumstances presented in this case, the defendant should be afforded one final 45-day period during which to complete discovery. The case shall remain on the Trial Calendar during this period (see, 22 NYCRR 202.21 [d]). Mangano, J.P., Lawrence, Kooper and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ronel-Bennett v. Consol. Edison Co. of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 24, 1989
149 A.D.2d 678 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Ronel-Bennett v. Consol. Edison Co. of N.Y

Case Details

Full title:RONEL-BENNETT, INC., Respondent, v. CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 24, 1989

Citations

149 A.D.2d 678 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

Richardson v. Bloomingdale's

Nevertheless, since there is some question regarding responsibility for the inaction and apparent scheduling…

Narissi v. Hussain

days after service upon the appellants of a copy of this decision and order. While the Supreme Court did not…