From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ronald A. Smith Assoc. v. Hutchinson Technology Incorp.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Sep 5, 2002
No. C-01-3847 WHA (N.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2002)

Opinion

No. C-01-3847 WHA

September 5, 2002

J. William Wigert, Jr., William R. Overend, CROSBY, HEAFEY, ROACH MAY, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants, Ronald A. Smith Associates and IPAM, Inc.

Kenneth A. Liebman, David J.F. Gross (pro hac vice), Nicholas G. Leonard (pro hac vice), FAEGRE BENSON, Minneapolis, MN, Charles S. Treat LATHAM WATKINS, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendant-Counterclaimant Hutchinson Technology Incorporated.


STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION


IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action, through their respective counsel of record, that this action and all claims and counterclaims asserted therein are hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs in connection with the above-captioned action.

DATED: September 3, 2002

CROSBY, HEAFEY ROACH MAY Professional Corporation

By /s/ J. William Wigert Jr.

/s/ William r. Overend _________________________ William R. Overend Attorney for Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants Ronald A. Smith Associates and IPAM, Inc.

DATED: September 3, 2002.

FAEGRE BENSON LLP

By /s/ Kenneth A. Liebman _____________________ Kenneth A. Liebman Niholas G. Leonard Attorney for Defendant-Counterclaimant Hutchinson Technology Incorporated

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ronald A. Smith Assoc. v. Hutchinson Technology Incorp.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Sep 5, 2002
No. C-01-3847 WHA (N.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2002)
Case details for

Ronald A. Smith Assoc. v. Hutchinson Technology Incorp.

Case Details

Full title:RONALD A. SMITH ASSOCIATES, a California corporation; and IPAM, INC., a…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Sep 5, 2002

Citations

No. C-01-3847 WHA (N.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2002)

Citing Cases

Cequent Performance Prods., Inc. v. Hopkins Mfg. Corp.

See Writing Explained, http://writingexplained.org/continually-vs-continuously-difference. See also Chicago…