Romulus Development Corp. v. Township of Weehawken

Full title: ROMULUS DEVELOPMENT CORP., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF WEEHAWKEN…

Court: Tax Court of New Jersey

Date published: Mar 5, 1987

9 N.J. Tax 90 (Tax 1987)

Opinion

Submitted February 19, 1987.

Decided March 5, 1987.

Appeal from the Tax Court of New Jersey.

Venino Venino, attorneys for the appellant Township of Weehawken ( Richard Venino of counsel and on the brief).

Sidney I. Turtz, attorney for the appellant Town of West New York.

McCarter English, attorneys for respondent ( William T. Reilly of counsel; Frank E. Ferruggia on the brief).

Before Judges FURMAN, DREIER and SHEBELL.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Lasser in his opinion published at 7 N.J. Tax 305 (Tax Ct. 1985).