Opinion
No. 09-71525 Agency No. A093-142-519
11-13-2012
SANDRA ROMERO-VALENZUELA, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Sandra Romero-Valenzuela, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge's decision denying her motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Reynoso- Cisneros v. Gonzales, 491 F.3d 1001, 1002 (9th Cir. 2007) (per curiam), and we grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings.
In concluding that the agency lacked jurisdiction to reopen Romero-Valenzuela's proceedings as a result of her prior deportation, the BIA did not have the benefit of Reyes-Torres v. Holder, 645 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir. 2011), in which we held that 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(d) did not preclude the filing of a motion to reopen after the petitioner had been removed. See Reyes-Torres, 645 F.3d at 1076-77; see also Reynoso-Cisneros, 491 F.3d at 1002 (treating departure bars under 8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.2(d) and 1003.23(b)(1) as substantively identical). We remand to the BIA in light of this intervening caselaw.
In light of our disposition, we need not address Romero-Valenzuela's remaining contentions.
PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.