From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romero v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 19, 2017
No. 71287 (Nev. App. Apr. 19, 2017)

Opinion

No. 71287

04-19-2017

ANNA REBECCA ROMERO, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Appellant Anna Rebecca Romero appeals from a judgment of conviction entered pursuant to a guilty plea of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor, a controlled substance, or a prohibited substance with a prior DUI felony conviction. Sixth Judicial District Court, Humboldt County; Michael Montero, Judge.

Romero claims the district court abused its discretion at sentencing by imposing the sentence in this case to run consecutive to the sentence in criminal case FP 13-1403. However, the district court has discretion to impose consecutive sentences, NRS 176.035(1) & (3); Pitmon v. State, 131 Nev. ___, ___, 352 P.3d 655, 659 (Ct. App. 2015), and we conclude Romero failed to demonstrate the district court abused its discretion by doing so in this case, see Chavez v. State, 125 Nev. 328, 348, 213 P.3d 476, 490 (2009).

Romero also claims the district court abused its discretion by denying her credit for time served in presentence confinement. However, the record indicates Romero was still on probation in criminal case FP 13-1403 when she committed the instant offense. Accordingly, Romero was not entitled to credit for the instant offense, see NRS 176.055(2)(b), and we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in this regard, see Chavez, 125 Nev. at 348, 213 P.'3d at 490.

Having concluded Romero is not entitled to relief, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

We reject the State's assertion this appeal should be dismissed for violating the provisions of NRS 177.015(4). NRS 177.015(4) permits a defendant to appeal from a final judgment resulting from a guilty plea if "the appeal is based upon reasonable constitutional, jurisdictional or other grounds that challenge the legality of the. proceedings." (Emphasis added). And Franklin v. State, 110 Nev. 750, 752, 877 P.2d 1058, 1059 (1994), overruled on other grounds by Thomas v. State, 115 Nev. 148, 979 P.2d 222 (1999), identifies "a challenge to the sentence imposed on constitutional or other grounds" as a claim that may be raised on direct appeal from a final judgment resulting from a guilty plea. --------

/s/_________, C.J.

Silver

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons cc: Hon. Michael Montero, District Judge

Humboldt County Public Defender

Attorney General/Carson City

Humboldt County District Attorney

Humboldt County Clerk


Summaries of

Romero v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 19, 2017
No. 71287 (Nev. App. Apr. 19, 2017)
Case details for

Romero v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANNA REBECCA ROMERO, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 19, 2017

Citations

No. 71287 (Nev. App. Apr. 19, 2017)